“As a result, the port-rail area has different operational and infrastructural needs, which should be reflected in the legal regime applicable to the port-rail interface”, the two associations highlighted in a joint paper. What they are asking is to assess, together with EU legislators, to what extent the current regulatory framework of the port-rail interface can be simplified without hampering safety and interoperability.

Better port-rail coordination

Concerning the cooperation between ports and railways, CER and ESPO underlined how fragmentation continues to be a challenge. The main issues they identified are “fragmented planning, complex interfaces between actors, different IT-systems, limited data exchange and last-mile cost challenges”. According to them, port authorities, railway undertakings, infrastructure managers and terminal operators all need to ramp up their commitment. They should prioritise the standardisation of IT systems and data exchange as well as planning and investments.

It’s all about the money, money, money

The last issue brought up in the joint paper published by CER and ESPO is adequate funding. Despite acknowledging the importance of mechanisms such as the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and the implementation of the TEN-T corridors, they pointed out the need for more. For example, the two associations are asking to increase the CEF package for 2028-2034 to 100 billion euros, compared to the current 81 and change.

They are not alone in this quest, as the same request was recently brought forward by the European Economic and Social Committee. “Adequate EU grants remain indispensable to address infrastructure gaps, strengthen dual-use readiness and support projects with high European added value”, the CEF and ESPO’s joint paper stressed. The cries for help continue to be many, coming from all sides of the logistics and supply chain industry, but managing to be listened to remains the most significant obstacle.

European Cargo Experience

The synergies between ports, terminals and railways will be one of the focal points of the upcoming European Cargo Experience. This brand new event, organised jointly by RailFreight.com and our sister publications World Cargo News and ProjectCargo Journal, will take place in Gdansk on 6 and 7 May 2025.

By gathering players from various sectors, the European Cargo Experience will be the perfect opportunity to have meaningful discussions about the current situation and how it can be improved. Find out more about the programme here and register for the event here, the Early Bird discount only lasts another week.

Hosted by German national rail carrier Deutsche Bahn in Berlin, the 10th annual Symposium brought together stakeholders from science, politics and economics to debate the regulatory framework in the rail sector and other network industries.

It is designed to focus on issues which perhaps do not get the attention they deserve in the wider field, and Ms Bulc was one of a series of high profile speakers who also included Michael Odenwald, from the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure, and Dr Rüdiger Grube, (now formerly) of Deutsche Bahn, who also represented the Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies.

Serious nuisance

Tackling the issue of rail freight head-on, Ms Bulc said: “This is surely the most sensitive environment problem the sector faces and, I recognise, a serious nuisance for citizens living close to railway lines. I also know what a big issue this has become here in Germany.”

Work had already begun – specifically the revision of the TSI rolling stock noise reduction policy – to address it, she said, and the European Commission aimed to finalise the revision process in the first half of 2018. Ms Bulc urged delegates to work constructively on an EU-wide solution which had to be efficient, cost effective, fair and one with which all member states could align their national plans.

At risk

“And if we don’t? Then we run the risk that member states will introduce national, unilateral measures. Such types of measures would put the internal railway market and rail interoperability at risk. They would force the Commission to take action – let us not go there,” she added.

Turning to the equally critical issue of the European Rail Freight Corridors, Ms Bulc stressed to delegates that the EC knew of its responsibility of working with stakeholders to improve overall conditions for rail freight across the continent: “In a nutshell, this is about enhancing cross-border rail freight through intensive co-operation between all the relevant stakeholders,” she said. “In practice, cooperation means better coordination – of infrastructure capacity, of investments, of traffic management and of maintenance works.”

Tough options

She also referred to the recent Rail Freight Day event in Vienna, which showed how much ‘we can and do’ to make rail freight corridors deliver.

This would be done by solving problems whether they are operational, legal or political; by consulting the sector, including end-customers like shippers and forwarders, to see what works and what doesn’t; and by bringing forward tough options for investments.

“On this aspect, I do hope that the sector will maintain the momentum of the Rotterdam Declaration, and deliver those necessary improvements without waiting for legislative changes,” said Ms Bulc. “I know that legal stability is important for the sector and we want to legislate only if there is no simpler alternative way to achieve our objectives.”

The Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics and the ESMT European School of Management and Technology were co-organisers of the Symposium.