UNION PACIFIC AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN

Rail freight mega-merger in the US keeps encountering opposition

A double-stacked Union Pacific container train. Image: Shutterstock. © Philip Pilosian
A double-stacked Union Pacific container train. Image: Shutterstock. © Philip Pilosian

The merger of Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS), two of the largest rail freight companies in the US, continues to stir controversy. Shippers worrying they will be held captive and workers fearing for massive personnel cuts and worsening safety conditions are urging authorities not to approve the deal.

Subscribe to gain access to all news

Already have a subscription? Log in.

Choose your subscription

Considering a corporate subscription? Contact us to find out more.

Or

Want to read this article for free?

You can read one free article per month. Enter your email and we'll send you a free link to access the full article. No payment required.

Author: Marco Raimondi

Marco Raimondi is an editor of RailFreight.com, the online magazine for rail freight professionals.

E-mail

Related posts

Market transformation Data of the week: Public companies are on the retreat in European rail freight

State-owned companies are playing an ever smaller role in the European rail freight industry. New market entrants are proving themselves to be worthy competitors. At…
MUST-ATTEND EVENT More speakers confirmed for the European Cargo Experience

The first edition of the European Cargo Experience is less than two months away, with more and more speakers being confirmed. Held in Gdansk, Poland,…
Open discussion Signalling is not the only lever. Why operational innovation can’t wait for ERTMS

Decades of debate about signalling systems have framed rail’s capacity crisis as an infrastructure problem. But the internet taught us that the most transformative capacity…
A look back at a lively discussion 740-metre trains have shown themselves to be surprisingly divisive

Some time ago, RailFreight.com published an opinion piece taking a rarely heard perspective. It argued against the urgency of 740-metre trains in Europe. RailFreight.com and…

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.

Subscribe to gain access to all news

Already have a subscription? Log in.

Choose your subscription

Considering a corporate subscription? Contact us to find out more.

Or

Want to read this article for free?

You can read one free article per month. Enter your email and we'll send you a free link to access the full article. No payment required.